Rotation Safety
Are rotation steps ordered to avoid outages or auth loops?
Measures AI models on remediating exposed secrets, over-privileged identities, stale credentials, and weak authentication configurations across cloud and SaaS.
Each model response is judged on these dimensions by an LLM-as-Judge calibrated against expert annotations.
Are rotation steps ordered to avoid outages or auth loops?
Are IAM rewrites minimal yet sufficient for the workload?
Does the model correctly classify real secrets vs. false positives?
Are the remediation steps ready for a JIT or break-glass operator?
Does the fix produce an evidence trail compatible with SOC 2 / ISO?
An illustrative case to show how the model is presented with a problem and how its response is scored.
AWS access key AKIA... committed to public GitHub repo in `config/prod.env`.
Generate the safe rotation sequence and remediation PR that prevents recurrence.
Step 1: revoke key via IAM. Step 2: invalidate in CI secret store. Step 3: rotate consuming services. Step 4: replace with OIDC-federated short-lived credentials. Add pre-commit hook.
Models that recommend simply rotating the static key without moving to short-lived credentials are penalized.
All Remediation Labs benchmarks evolve through three versions, increasing in difficulty and realism.
Models are given the raw security finding and asked to recommend a remediation. No environment context provided.
Models receive the finding plus relevant system, code, and policy context. Evaluated on contextual reasoning quality.
Models must produce a remediation that can be safely executed end-to-end — code patches, IaC changes, runbook steps — with verification.
Get model leaderboards, scoring methodology, dataset details, and roadmap access — or discuss generating proprietary remediation datasets for your environment.
Or email us directly at info@remediationlabs.com