Correctness
Does the remediation resolve the misconfiguration as defined by the policy?
Measures whether AI models can recommend safe, policy-compliant remediations for cloud misconfigurations across AWS, GCP, and Azure — at code (IaC) and runtime layers.
Each model response is judged on these dimensions by an LLM-as-Judge calibrated against expert annotations.
Does the remediation resolve the misconfiguration as defined by the policy?
Does the fix avoid granting unnecessary permissions or exposing surface area?
Does the model cite the relevant CIS/NIST/PCI control accurately?
Can the model generate parallel fixes across AWS, GCP, and Azure variants?
Does the model reason about dependent resources before recommending changes?
An illustrative case to show how the model is presented with a problem and how its response is scored.
S3 bucket "prod-customer-uploads" has public-read ACL and no encryption at rest.
Generate a Terraform patch that removes public access, enables SSE-KMS, and preserves existing IAM grants used by lambda-thumbnailer.
Remove ACL grant, add server_side_encryption_configuration with kms_master_key_id, leave bucket policy for the lambda role untouched. Cite CIS AWS 2.1.1 and 2.1.5.
Judges flag any policy that broadens access beyond the minimum needed to satisfy the lambda role.
All Remediation Labs benchmarks evolve through three versions, increasing in difficulty and realism.
Models are given the raw security finding and asked to recommend a remediation. No environment context provided.
Models receive the finding plus relevant system, code, and policy context. Evaluated on contextual reasoning quality.
Models must produce a remediation that can be safely executed end-to-end — code patches, IaC changes, runbook steps — with verification.
Get model leaderboards, scoring methodology, dataset details, and roadmap access — or discuss generating proprietary remediation datasets for your environment.
Or email us directly at info@remediationlabs.com